CART vs MELI Stock Comparison
CART currently leads MELI in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 70 vs 31. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between CART and MELI?
CART leads the current stock comparison as Maplebear Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Maplebear Inc. vs MercadoLibre, Inc.
CART leads
CART leads by 39 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, and the lead has widened from 13 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors MELI on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support CART, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Maplebear Inc.
MercadoLibre, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors CART over MELI, 70 versus 31 as of Oct 31, 2026. CART's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value. CART also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors MELI. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CART today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the lead has swung materially session to session. CART lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 39 points over 30 sessions. CART leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Maplebear Inc. and MercadoLibre, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare CART and MELI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum79 vs 8CART +71
- Value61 vs 24CART +37
- Quality77 vs 51CART +26
- Risk Resilience57 vs 43CART +14
4 of 6 evidence groups favor CART. CART’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
CART's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — CART and MELI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
CART (Maplebear Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
MELI (MercadoLibre, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
CARTCART on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MELIMELI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
CARTCART on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points.
Momentum
CARTCART on the Momentum factor, by 71 points.
Lower downside
CARTCART on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
MELIMELI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors CART, analyst targets favor MELI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | CART | MELI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.3% | +33.7% | MELI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58.6% | +32.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 15 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor CART. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | CART | 70 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | MELIon balance | revenue growth 2.4% vs 15%; EPS growth -22% vs 11.7%; TTM ROE 17.6% vs 26.5%; gross margin 72.4% vs 42.7%; operating margin 14.8% vs 8.3% — MELI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | CART | Value 61 vs 24 |
| Technicals | CART | Price vs 50-day 15.7% vs -12.3%; vs 200-day 35.3% vs -8% |
| Risk Resilience | CART | Risk Resilience 57 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | MELI | Target upside -0.3% vs 33.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of CART and MELI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 39 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on CART.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28CART lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 39 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- CART +39
- 70 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- CART +32
- 71 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- CART +13
- 63 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- CART +19
- 70 vs 51
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only CART
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only MELI
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode.
CART leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.16%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.14%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MELI closes the Momentum gap — currently 71 points behind, the largest single contributor to CART's edge.
- 2MELI's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3CART's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MELI leads on balance| Metric | CART | MELI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.4% | 15% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -22% | 11.7% |
| Gross margin | 72.4% | 42.7% |
| Operating margin | 14.8% | 8.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.6% | 26.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 1.68 |
Performance
CART leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | CART | MELI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 15.3% | -9.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 31.2% | -3.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 30.5% | -11.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 38% | -5.3% |
| Year to date | 24.5% | -16.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 49.2% | -22.6% |
Technicals
CART has the stronger structure| Metric | CART | MELI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 78.8 | 27.4 |
| ADX (14) | 39.1 | 17.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 15.7% | -12.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 35.3% | -8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 49.3% | 49.3% |
Risk
CART is the more resilient| Metric | CART | MELI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.44 | 1.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.13 | -0.67 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.89 | -0.86 |
| Max drawdown | -28.8% | -34.5% |
| Current drawdown | -4% | -29.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 43.8% | 40.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, CART or MELI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, CART is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 70 against MELI's 31. The edge comes from momentum and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is CART or MELI the better buy right now?
CART carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor CART over MELI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. CART leads Momentum by 71 points; CART leads Value by 37 points; CART leads Quality by 26 points. CART leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by MELI simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, CART or MELI?
Analyst price targets imply -0.3% upside for CART and +33.7% for MELI, so the Street currently favors MELI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors CART. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, CART or MELI?
CART is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. CART on the peer-relative Value factor, by 37 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, CART or MELI?
MELI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, CART or MELI?
CART on the Momentum factor, by 71 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, CART or MELI?
CART is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. CART on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is CART more profitable than MELI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 72.4% vs 42.7%; operating margin 14.8% vs 8.3%; ttm roe 17.6% vs 26.5%. CART leads on two measures and MELI on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is CART's lead over MELI getting stronger or weaker?
CART lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 13 to 39 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the CART vs MELI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MELI closes the Momentum gap — currently 71 points behind, the largest single contributor to CART's edge; MELI's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; CART's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 5 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about CART and MELI?
CART: 5 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. MELI: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on CART is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MELI it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare CART and MELI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.