DOC vs HR Stock Comparison
Compare DOC and HR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between DOC and HR?
HR leads the current stock comparison as Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. vs Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
HR leads
HR leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HR, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Healthpeak Properties, Inc.
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HR over DOC, 42 versus 34 as of Sep 11, 2026. HR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while DOC holds the stronger risk resilience profile. HR also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. HR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Healthpeak Properties, Inc. and Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare DOC and HR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value35 vs 61HR +26
- Risk Resilience76 vs 56DOC +20
- Quality15 vs 22HR +7
- Momentum32 vs 33Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HR. HR’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; DOC keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -10
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
HR's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — DOC and HR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HR (Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
DOC (Healthpeak Properties, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 16.7% against 11%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HRHR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HRHR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HRHR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DOCDOC on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
HRHR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | DOC | HR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +5.5% | +13.5% | HR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.7% | +28% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HR | 34 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | HRon balance | revenue growth 2.5% vs 1%; EPS growth -71.4% vs -60.9%; TTM ROE 3.3% vs -1.9%; gross margin 2.5% vs 16.6%; operating margin 17.6% vs 22.6% — HR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HR | Value 35 vs 61 |
| Technicals | DOC | Price vs 50-day -5.5% vs -6.1%; vs 200-day 9.2% vs 0.7% |
| Risk Resilience | DOC | Risk Resilience 76 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | HR | Target upside 5.5% vs 13.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of DOC and HR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HR +8
- 34 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- HR +7
- 38 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 40 vs 40
- 90 sessions ago
- DOC +2
- 50 vs 48
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 1 when HR moved ahead of DOC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.09%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.37%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
DOC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.34%, AIQ -3 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.11%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1DOC closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to HR's edge.
- 2DOC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3HR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HR leads on balance| Metric | DOC | HR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.5% | 1% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -71.4% | -60.9% |
| Gross margin | 2.5% | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% | 22.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.3% | -1.9% |
| Debt to equity | 1.32 | 1.04 |
Performance
DOC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | DOC | HR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.1% | -2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.4% | -1.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.5% | -7.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 19.3% | 3.2% |
| Year to date | 26.7% | 11.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 11.3% | 4.3% |
Technicals
DOC has the stronger structure| Metric | DOC | HR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.9 | 31.2 |
| ADX (14) | 16.7 | 26.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -5.5% | -6.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 9.2% | 0.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16.7% | 11% |
Risk
DOC is the more resilient| Metric | DOC | HR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.42 | 0.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.42 | -0.05 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.81 | -0.08 |
| Max drawdown | -18.5% | -13.7% |
| Current drawdown | -10.7% | -13.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.9% | 19.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, DOC or HR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 42 against DOC's 34. The edge comes from value and quality. DOC is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is DOC or HR the better buy right now?
HR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HR over DOC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HR leads Value by 26 points; DOC leads Risk Resilience by 20 points; HR leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, DOC or HR?
Analyst price targets imply +5.5% upside for DOC and +13.5% for HR, so the Street currently favors HR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, DOC or HR?
HR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, DOC or HR?
HR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, DOC or HR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, DOC or HR?
DOC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DOC on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is DOC more profitable than HR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 2.5% vs 16.6%; operating margin 17.6% vs 22.6%; ttm roe 3.3% vs -1.9%. DOC leads on one measure and HR on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HR's lead over DOC getting stronger or weaker?
HR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-01, when HR moved ahead of DOC.
What would change the DOC vs HR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: DOC closes the Value gap — currently 26 points behind, the largest single contributor to HR's edge; DOC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; HR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about DOC and HR?
DOC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. HR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on DOC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare DOC and HR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.