HR vs HST Stock Comparison
Compare HR and HST across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between HR and HST?
HST leads the current stock comparison as Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated vs Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
HST leads
HST leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Quality.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support HST, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors HST over HR, 51 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. HST's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and quality. HST also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HST today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. HST lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated and Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare HR and HST against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience56 vs 75HST +19
- Quality22 vs 39HST +17
- Value61 vs 68HST +7
- Momentum33 vs 32Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor HST. HST’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
HST's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — HR and HST both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
HST (Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and quality.
HR (Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
HSTHST on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
HSTHST on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
HSTHST on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
HSTHST on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | HR | HST | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +13.5% | +12.5% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +28% | +16% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor HST. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | HST | 42 vs 51 |
| Fundamentals | HRon balance | revenue growth 1% vs -0.3%; EPS growth -60.9% vs -52.1%; TTM ROE -1.9% vs 15.5%; gross margin 16.6% vs 15.8%; operating margin 22.6% vs 14.4% — HR takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | HST | Value 61 vs 68 |
| Technicals | HST | Price vs 50-day -6.1% vs -4.8%; vs 200-day 0.7% vs 5.4% |
| Risk Resilience | HST | Risk Resilience 56 vs 75 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 13.5% vs 12.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of HR and HST and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on HST.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10HST lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- HST +9
- 42 vs 51
- 7 sessions ago
- HST +7
- 45 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- HST +9
- 40 vs 49
- 90 sessions ago
- HST +5
- 48 vs 53
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 14 when HST moved ahead of HR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.37%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.18%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
HST leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.11%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.45%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1HR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to HST's edge.
- 2HR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3HST's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
HR leads on balance| Metric | HR | HST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1% | -0.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -60.9% | -52.1% |
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 15.8% |
| Operating margin | 22.6% | 14.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -1.9% | 15.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.04 | 0.88 |
Performance
HST leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | HR | HST |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.2% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -1.7% | -2.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.7% | -7.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.2% | 15.4% |
| Year to date | 11.4% | 24.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 4.3% | 27.3% |
Technicals
HST has the stronger structure| Metric | HR | HST |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 31.2 | 30.9 |
| ADX (14) | 26.5 | 29.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.1% | -4.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.7% | 5.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 11% | 15.6% |
Risk
HST is the more resilient| Metric | HR | HST |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.09 | 0.65 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.05 | 0.92 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.08 | 1.37 |
| Max drawdown | -13.7% | -15.3% |
| Current drawdown | -13.7% | -13.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.4% | 25.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2% | -2.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, HR or HST?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, HST is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 51 against HR's 42. The edge comes from risk resilience and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is HR or HST the better buy right now?
HST carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor HST over HR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. HST leads Risk Resilience by 19 points; HST leads Quality by 17 points; HST leads Value by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, HR or HST?
Analyst price targets imply +13.5% upside for HR and +12.5% for HST. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, HR or HST?
HST is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. HST on the peer-relative Value factor, by 7 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, HR or HST?
HST on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, HR or HST?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, HR or HST?
HST is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. HST on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is HR more profitable than HST?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 16.6% vs 15.8%; operating margin 22.6% vs 14.4%; ttm roe -1.9% vs 15.5%. HR leads on two measures and HST on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is HST's lead over HR getting stronger or weaker?
HST lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-14, when HST moved ahead of HR.
What would change the HR vs HST verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: HR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to HST's edge; HR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; HST's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about HR and HST?
HR: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. HST: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on HR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On HST it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare HR and HST with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.