INSP vs OSCR Stock Comparison
Compare INSP and OSCR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INSP and OSCR?
INSP leads the current stock comparison as Inspire Medical Systems, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. vs Oscar Health, Inc.
INSP leads
INSP leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors OSCR on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support INSP, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.
Oscar Health, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors INSP over OSCR, 66 versus 64 as of Sep 11, 2026. INSP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and momentum, while OSCR holds the stronger value profile. INSP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors OSCR. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INSP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. INSP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. and Oscar Health, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INSP and OSCR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience58 vs 28INSP +30
- Momentum78 vs 67INSP +11
- Value49 vs 59OSCR +10
- Quality77 vs 86OSCR +9
2 of 6 evidence groups favor INSP. INSP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and momentum; OSCR keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
INSP's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INSP and OSCR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
INSP (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience and momentum.
OSCR (Oscar Health, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, quality, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 49.1% against 42.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
INSPINSP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
INSPINSP on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OSCROSCR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
INSPINSP on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
INSPINSP on Risk Resilience, by 30 points.
Analyst upside
OSCROSCR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors INSP, analyst targets favor OSCR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | INSP | OSCR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -21.8% | -15.7% | OSCR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +80.6% | +83.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 10 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor INSP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 66 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | INSPon balance | revenue growth -2% vs 5%; EPS growth 102.8% vs -47.4%; TTM ROE 17.6% vs 38.5%; gross margin 86.1% vs 44.9%; operating margin 6% vs 4.1% — INSP takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OSCR | Value 49 vs 59 |
| Technicals | OSCR | Price vs 50-day 29.8% vs 7.1%; vs 200-day 0.2% vs 56.9% |
| Risk Resilience | INSP | Risk Resilience 58 vs 28 |
| Analyst expectations | OSCR | Target upside -21.8% vs -15.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INSP and OSCR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on INSP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10INSP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- INSP +2
- 66 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- INSP +1
- 65 vs 64
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 64 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- INSP +1
- 66 vs 65
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when INSP moved ahead of OSCR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (17.21%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (47.34%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
INSP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +7.16%, AIQ +1 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.58%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1OSCR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to INSP's edge.
- 2OSCR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3INSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INSP leads on balance| Metric | INSP | OSCR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -2% | 5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 102.8% | -47.4% |
| Gross margin | 86.1% | 44.9% |
| Operating margin | 6% | 4.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.6% | 38.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.04 | 0.21 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | INSP | OSCR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 8% | 7.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 16.9% | 10% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 61.1% | 17% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.9% | 143.1% |
| Year to date | -26.1% | 124.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -21.1% | 60.7% |
Technicals
OSCR has the stronger structure| Metric | INSP | OSCR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 69 | 55.4 |
| ADX (14) | 37.2 | 17.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 29.8% | 7.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.2% | 56.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 42.7% | 49.1% |
Risk
INSP is the more resilient| Metric | INSP | OSCR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.06 | 1.48 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.03 | 0.98 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.05 | 1.72 |
| Max drawdown | -72.2% | -51.7% |
| Current drawdown | -52.7% | -1.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 70.9% | 70.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5% | -5.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INSP or OSCR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, INSP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 66 against OSCR's 64. The edge comes from risk resilience and momentum. OSCR is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INSP or OSCR the better buy right now?
INSP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor INSP over OSCR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INSP leads Risk Resilience by 30 points; INSP leads Momentum by 11 points; OSCR leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INSP or OSCR?
Analyst price targets imply -21.8% upside for INSP and -15.7% for OSCR, so the Street currently favors OSCR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors INSP. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INSP or OSCR?
OSCR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OSCR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INSP or OSCR?
INSP on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INSP or OSCR?
INSP on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INSP or OSCR?
INSP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. INSP on Risk Resilience, by 30 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INSP more profitable than OSCR?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 86.1% vs 44.9%; operating margin 6% vs 4.1%; ttm roe 17.6% vs 38.5%. INSP leads on two measures and OSCR on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is INSP's lead over OSCR getting stronger or weaker?
INSP lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when INSP moved ahead of OSCR.
What would change the INSP vs OSCR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: OSCR closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to INSP's edge; OSCR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; INSP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INSP and OSCR?
INSP: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. OSCR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INSP is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On OSCR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INSP and OSCR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.