ITUB vs PBR Stock Comparison
Compare ITUB and PBR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ITUB and PBR?
PBR leads the current stock comparison as Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. vs Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
PBR leads
PBR leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 16 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support PBR, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PBR over ITUB, 67 versus 55 as of Sep 11, 2026. PBR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. PBR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PBR today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. PBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A. and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ITUB and PBR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality38 vs 72PBR +34
- Value64 vs 70PBR +6
- Momentum79 vs 77Even
- Risk Resilience34 vs 34Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor PBR. PBR’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.9%)
PBR's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ITUB and PBR both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PBRPBR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PBRPBR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PBRPBR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
ITUBITUB carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
PBRPBR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ITUB | PBR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -20.7% | +0.2% | PBR has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +23.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PBR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PBR | 55 vs 67 |
| Fundamentals | PBR | revenue growth 2.8% vs 42.8%; EPS growth 5.8% vs 68.8%; TTM ROE 21.9% vs 30.9%; gross margin 35.9% vs 49.2%; operating margin 14.3% vs 32.8% |
| Valuation | PBR | Value 64 vs 70 |
| Technicals | PBR | Price vs 50-day 3.9% vs 14.8%; vs 200-day 2.5% vs 24.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 34 vs 34 |
| Analyst expectations | PBR | Target upside -20.7% vs 0.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ITUB and PBR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PBR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10PBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PBR +12
- 55 vs 67
- 7 sessions ago
- PBR +11
- 55 vs 66
- 30 sessions ago
- PBR +16
- 43 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 55 vs 55
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jun 26 when ITUB moved ahead of PBR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (1.05%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
6 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.37%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
ITUB is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.36%, AIQ +2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.84%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ITUB closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to PBR's edge.
- 2ITUB's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3PBR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate PBR's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PBR leads on balance| Metric | ITUB | PBR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 2.8% | 42.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 5.8% | 68.8% |
| Gross margin | 35.9% | 49.2% |
| Operating margin | 14.3% | 32.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 21.9% | 30.9% |
| Debt to equity | 4.7 | 0.76 |
Performance
PBR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ITUB | PBR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 12.2% | 20.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.9% | 18.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1.8% | 12.6% |
| Year to date | 15.9% | 80.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 21.3% | 72.8% |
Technicals
PBR has the stronger structure| Metric | ITUB | PBR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 77.6 | 67.9 |
| ADX (14) | 23.1 | 25.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.9% | 14.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 2.5% | 24.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 33% | 37.8% |
Risk
Split| Metric | ITUB | PBR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.11 | -0.19 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.67 | 1.7 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.08 | 2.71 |
| Max drawdown | -25.1% | -27.4% |
| Current drawdown | -13.3% | -3% |
| Annualized volatility | 31.8% | 33.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.3% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ITUB or PBR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PBR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 67 against ITUB's 55. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ITUB or PBR the better buy right now?
PBR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PBR over ITUB?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PBR leads Quality by 34 points; PBR leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ITUB or PBR?
Analyst price targets imply -20.7% upside for ITUB and +0.2% for PBR, so the Street currently favors PBR. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ITUB or PBR?
PBR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PBR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ITUB or PBR?
PBR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ITUB or PBR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ITUB or PBR?
ITUB is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ITUB carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ITUB more profitable than PBR?
PBR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 35.9% vs 49.2%; operating margin 14.3% vs 32.8%; ttm roe 21.9% vs 30.9%.
Is PBR's lead over ITUB getting stronger or weaker?
PBR lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-06-26, when ITUB moved ahead of PBR.
What would change the ITUB vs PBR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ITUB closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to PBR's edge; ITUB's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; PBR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 12-point move would eliminate PBR's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ITUB and PBR?
ITUB: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PBR: 6 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ITUB is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PBR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ITUB and PBR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.