KIM vs REG Stock Comparison
KIM currently leads REG in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 50. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between KIM and REG?
KIM leads the current stock comparison as Kimco Realty Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Kimco Realty Corporation vs Regency Centers Corporation
KIM leads
KIM leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors REG on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support KIM, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Kimco Realty Corporation
Regency Centers Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors KIM over REG, 53 versus 50 as of Oct 21, 2026. KIM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum. KIM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors REG. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KIM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. KIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Kimco Realty Corporation and Regency Centers Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare KIM and REG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality48 vs 43KIM +5
- Momentum56 vs 52KIM +4
- Risk Resilience79 vs 77Even
- Value42 vs 43Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor KIM. KIM’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
New signals
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
KIM's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — KIM and REG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
KIM (Kimco Realty Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
REG (Regency Centers Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
KIMKIM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
KIMKIM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
KIMKIM on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
REGREG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
REGREG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors KIM, analyst targets favor REG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | KIM | REG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +16% | +17.1% | REG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +22.8% | +17.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 13 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 13.34% | 3.82% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.540 | $2.380 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.010 | $2.870 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #20 |
KIM grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 13.34% a year against REG's 3.82%. REG never reduced its regular dividend in the window; KIM did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor KIM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | REGon balance | revenue growth -1.3% vs 0.3%; EPS growth 4.3% vs -10.3%; TTM ROE 5.8% vs 9.6%; gross margin 54.8% vs 35.1%; operating margin 35.8% vs 40.3% — REG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 42 vs 43 |
| Technicals | KIM | Price vs 50-day -1.8% vs -2.5%; vs 200-day -1.7% vs -4.3% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 79 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | REG | Target upside 16% vs 17.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of KIM and REG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on KIM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20KIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- KIM +3
- 53 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- KIM +3
- 51 vs 48
- 30 sessions ago
- KIM +1
- 45 vs 44
- 90 sessions ago
- KIM +2
- 47 vs 45
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only KIM
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only REG
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.48%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
KIM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.22%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.34%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1REG closes the Quality gap — currently 5 points behind, the largest single contributor to KIM's edge.
- 2REG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3KIM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
REG leads on balance| Metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.3% | 0.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.3% | -10.3% |
| Gross margin | 54.8% | 35.1% |
| Operating margin | 35.8% | 40.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 5.8% | 9.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.85 | 0.8 |
Performance
KIM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2% | -0.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -12% | -11% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -2.9% | -8.5% |
| Year to date | 13.5% | 6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 6.4% | 2.1% |
Technicals
KIM has the stronger structure| Metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 66.8 | 60.8 |
| ADX (14) | 28.6 | 29.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.8% | -2.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.7% | -4.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13.8% | 12.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | KIM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.06 | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.16 | -0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.28 | -0.14 |
| Max drawdown | -17.2% | -14.4% |
| Current drawdown | -12.8% | -11.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.6% | 15.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -1.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, KIM or REG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, KIM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 53 against REG's 50. The edge comes from quality and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is KIM or REG the better buy right now?
KIM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor KIM over REG?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. KIM leads Quality by 5 points; KIM leads Momentum by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, KIM or REG?
Analyst price targets imply +16% upside for KIM and +17.1% for REG, so the Street currently favors REG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors KIM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, KIM or REG?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, KIM or REG?
KIM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, KIM or REG?
KIM on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, KIM or REG?
REG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. REG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is KIM more profitable than REG?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 54.8% vs 35.1%; operating margin 35.8% vs 40.3%; ttm roe 5.8% vs 9.6%. KIM leads on one measure and REG on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is KIM's lead over REG getting stronger or weaker?
KIM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the KIM vs REG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: REG closes the Quality gap — currently 5 points behind, the largest single contributor to KIM's edge; REG's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; KIM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about KIM and REG?
KIM: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. REG: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on KIM is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On REG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare KIM and REG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.