LITE vs LSCC Stock Comparison
LSCC currently leads LITE in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 37 vs 31. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between LITE and LSCC?
LSCC leads the current stock comparison as Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Lumentum Holdings Inc. vs Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
LSCC leads
LSCC leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support LSCC, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors LSCC over LITE, 37 versus 31 as of Oct 21, 2026. LSCC's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. LSCC also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. LSCC lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Lumentum Holdings Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare LITE and LSCC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality43 vs 64LSCC +21
- Risk Resilience39 vs 43LSCC +4
- Momentum21 vs 18Even
- Value24 vs 24Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor LSCC. LSCC’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
LSCC's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — LITE and LSCC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
LITE (Lumentum Holdings Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 73.4% against 51.2%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
LSCCLSCC on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
LSCCLSCC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
LSCCLSCC on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
LSCCLSCC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | LITE | LSCC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +27.6% | +45% | LSCC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +41.5% | +28.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 13 | 7 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor LSCC. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | LSCC | 31 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | LSCCon balance | revenue growth 24.5% vs 17.7%; EPS growth -49.3% vs -12.5%; TTM ROE -3% vs 4.9%; gross margin 41.7% vs 67.7%; operating margin 17.4% vs 7.6% — LSCC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 24 vs 24 |
| Technicals | LITE | Price vs 50-day -8.6% vs -9.7%; vs 200-day 5.3% vs -6.7% |
| Risk Resilience | LSCC | Risk Resilience 39 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | LSCC | Target upside 27.6% vs 45% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of LITE and LSCC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on LSCC.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20LSCC lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- LSCC +6
- 31 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- LSCC +4
- 33 vs 37
- 30 sessions ago
- LSCC +11
- 42 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- LITE +1
- 50 vs 49
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 11 when LSCC moved ahead of LITE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
LITE and LSCC carry the same 4 signals, so the signals do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, MACD Bearish Crossover.
LSCC leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.43%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.35%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1LITE closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge.
- 2LITE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3LSCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate LSCC's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
LSCC leads on balance| Metric | LITE | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 24.5% | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -49.3% | -12.5% |
| Gross margin | 41.7% | 67.7% |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -3% | 4.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.36 | 0.05 |
Performance
LITE leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | LITE | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -16.7% | -11.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13% | -12.3% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.9% | -21.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1.7% | -8.2% |
| Year to date | 123.2% | 46% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 405.4% | 53% |
Technicals
LITE has the stronger structure| Metric | LITE | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.7 | 32 |
| ADX (14) | 20.8 | 20.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.6% | -9.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.3% | -6.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 73.4% | 51.2% |
Risk
LSCC is the more resilient| Metric | LITE | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.01 | 3 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.08 | 0.94 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.87 | 1.47 |
| Max drawdown | -42.8% | -33.3% |
| Current drawdown | -27.4% | -30.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 99.1% | 61.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -8.8% | -6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, LITE or LSCC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, LSCC is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 37 against LITE's 31. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is LITE or LSCC the better buy right now?
LSCC carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor LSCC over LITE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. LSCC leads Quality by 21 points; LSCC leads Risk Resilience by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, LITE or LSCC?
Analyst price targets imply +27.6% upside for LITE and +45% for LSCC, so the Street currently favors LSCC. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, LITE or LSCC?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, LITE or LSCC?
LSCC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, LITE or LSCC?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, LITE or LSCC?
LSCC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. LSCC on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is LITE more profitable than LSCC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 41.7% vs 67.7%; operating margin 17.4% vs 7.6%; ttm roe -3% vs 4.9%. LITE leads on one measure and LSCC on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is LSCC's lead over LITE getting stronger or weaker?
LSCC lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-11, when LSCC moved ahead of LITE.
What would change the LITE vs LSCC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: LITE closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to LSCC's edge; LITE's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; LSCC's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate LSCC's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about LITE and LSCC?
LITE: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. LSCC: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on LITE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On LSCC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare LITE and LSCC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.