NTRS vs OZK Stock Comparison
OZK currently leads NTRS in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 60 vs 51. The clearest difference is value, while NTRS has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between NTRS and OZK?
OZK leads the current stock comparison as Bank OZK, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Northern Trust Corporation vs Bank OZK
OZK leads
OZK leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support OZK, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Northern Trust Corporation
Bank OZK
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OZK over NTRS, 60 versus 51 as of Oct 21, 2026. OZK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while NTRS holds the stronger risk resilience profile. OZK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OZK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. OZK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Northern Trust Corporation and Bank OZK across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare NTRS and OZK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value42 vs 64OZK +22
- Quality56 vs 65OZK +9
- Risk Resilience77 vs 71NTRS +6
- Momentum39 vs 43OZK +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor OZK. OZK’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; NTRS keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +8
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
OZK's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NTRS and OZK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OZK (Bank OZK): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
NTRS (Northern Trust Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OZKOZK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NTRSNTRS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
OZKOZK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points.
Momentum
OZKOZK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
NTRSNTRS on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
OZKOZK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NTRS | OZK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +9.3% | +14.4% | OZK has more room |
| Target dispersion | +13.2% | +18.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | NTRS | OZK |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 2.06% | 10.06% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.800 | $1.078 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $3.100 | $1.740 |
| Years increased | 3 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #327 | #100 |
OZK grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 10.06% a year against NTRS's 2.06%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor OZK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OZK | 51 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | NTRSon balance | revenue growth 11.3% vs 1.7%; EPS growth 56.2% vs 3.5%; TTM ROE 17.1% vs 11.2%; gross margin 59.8% vs 56%; operating margin 19.8% vs 32.3% — NTRS takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | OZK | Value 42 vs 64 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -6.6% vs 0.2%; vs 200-day 0.6% vs -4.6% |
| Risk Resilience | NTRS | Risk Resilience 77 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | OZK | Target upside 9.3% vs 14.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NTRS and OZK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OZK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20OZK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OZK +9
- 51 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- OZK +10
- 49 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- OZK +9
- 48 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- OZK +3
- 62 vs 65
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Aug 19 when OZK moved ahead of NTRS.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only NTRS
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.62%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only OZK
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.80%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
OZK leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.89%, AIQ +2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +4.18%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NTRS closes the Value gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to OZK's edge.
- 2NTRS's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3OZK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NTRS leads on balance| Metric | NTRS | OZK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.3% | 1.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 56.2% | 3.5% |
| Gross margin | 59.8% | 56% |
| Operating margin | 19.8% | 32.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.1% | 11.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.18 | 0.11 |
Performance
NTRS leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | NTRS | OZK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.2% | 2.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.6% | -1.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -7.4% | -9.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.5% | -4.9% |
| Year to date | 21.1% | 0.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 32.8% | -1.8% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | NTRS | OZK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.5 | 51 |
| ADX (14) | 38.1 | 29.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.6% | 0.2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.6% | -4.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17% | 28.1% |
Risk
NTRS is the more resilient| Metric | NTRS | OZK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.91 | 0.54 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.11 | -0.04 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.77 | -0.05 |
| Max drawdown | -15.1% | -17.9% |
| Current drawdown | -13.6% | -13.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 24.6% | 23.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.6% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NTRS or OZK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OZK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 60 against NTRS's 51. The edge comes from value and quality. NTRS is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NTRS or OZK the better buy right now?
OZK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OZK over NTRS?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. OZK leads Value by 22 points; OZK leads Quality by 9 points; NTRS leads Risk Resilience by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NTRS or OZK?
Analyst price targets imply +9.3% upside for NTRS and +14.4% for OZK, so the Street currently favors OZK. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NTRS or OZK?
OZK is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OZK on the peer-relative Value factor, by 22 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NTRS or OZK?
NTRS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NTRS or OZK?
OZK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NTRS or OZK?
NTRS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NTRS on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NTRS more profitable than OZK?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 59.8% vs 56%; operating margin 19.8% vs 32.3%; ttm roe 17.1% vs 11.2%. NTRS leads on two measures and OZK on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is OZK's lead over NTRS getting stronger or weaker?
OZK lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-19, when OZK moved ahead of NTRS.
What would change the NTRS vs OZK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NTRS closes the Value gap — currently 22 points behind, the largest single contributor to OZK's edge; NTRS's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; OZK's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NTRS and OZK?
NTRS: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. OZK: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NTRS is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On OZK it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NTRS and OZK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.