NVTS vs ONTO Stock Comparison
Compare NVTS vs ONTO on performance, valuation, growth, fundamentals, momentum and risk; the current AIQ evidence does not show a clear headline leader.
What is the main difference between NVTS and ONTO?
NVTS and ONTO are close on the current AIQ evidence, so the better fit depends more on objective, risk tolerance and valuation preference than on a single headline score.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Navitas Semiconductor Corp vs Onto Innovation Inc.
NVTS and ONTO are effectively level
NVTS and ONTO are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Navitas Semiconductor Corp
Onto Innovation Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate NVTS and ONTO as of Oct 21, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Navitas Semiconductor Corp and Onto Innovation Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare NVTS and ONTO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30 vs 48ONTO +18
- Momentum24 vs 8NVTS +16
- Value34 vs 28NVTS +6
- Risk Resilience40 vs 40Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVTS and ONTO both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
ONTOONTO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NVTSNVTS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
NVTSNVTS on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
ONTOONTO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NVTSNVTS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | NVTS | ONTO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +75.3% | +71.2% | NVTS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +52.3% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 31 vs 31 |
| Fundamentals | ONTOon balance | revenue growth 22.5% vs 17.5%; EPS growth -5.3% vs 79.4%; TTM ROE -61.5% vs 6.5%; gross margin -1.7% vs 50.4%; operating margin -270.2% vs 12.5% — ONTO takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NVTS | Value 34 vs 28 |
| Technicals | ONTO | Price vs 50-day -21.5% vs -21.4%; vs 200-day -34.6% vs -14.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 40 vs 40 |
| Analyst expectations | NVTS | Target upside 75.3% vs 71.2% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 0 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20ONTO lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 31 vs 31
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 31 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- ONTO +15
- 36 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- ONTO +10
- 42 vs 52
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Jul 29 when NVTS moved ahead of ONTO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only NVTS
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (14.51%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only ONTO
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (8.67%)
Both carry 4 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, MACD Bearish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.81%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.15%, AIQ 0 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ONTO leads on balance| Metric | NVTS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 22.5% | 17.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -5.3% | 79.4% |
| Gross margin | -1.7% | 50.4% |
| Operating margin | -270.2% | 12.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -61.5% | 6.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.77 |
Performance
ONTO leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | NVTS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -16.4% | -16.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -29.9% | -22.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -31% | -23.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -32.7% | -23.5% |
| Year to date | 22.4% | 39.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -43.5% | 66.1% |
Technicals
ONTO has the stronger structure| Metric | NVTS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 26.7 | 21 |
| ADX (14) | 17.8 | 22.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -21.5% | -21.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -34.6% | -14.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 69.6% | 58.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NVTS | ONTO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.84 | 3.09 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.12 | 0.99 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.23 | 1.65 |
| Max drawdown | -73.8% | -42.3% |
| Current drawdown | -72.5% | -42% |
| Annualized volatility | 120.6% | 71.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -10.1% | -7.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, NVTS or ONTO?
Analyst price targets imply +75.3% upside for NVTS and +71.2% for ONTO, so the Street currently favors NVTS. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVTS or ONTO?
NVTS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NVTS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVTS or ONTO?
ONTO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVTS or ONTO?
NVTS on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVTS or ONTO?
ONTO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ONTO carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVTS more profitable than ONTO?
ONTO leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin -1.7% vs 50.4%; operating margin -270.2% vs 12.5%; ttm roe -61.5% vs 6.5%.
What do the current signals say about NVTS and ONTO?
NVTS: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. ONTO: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVTS is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On ONTO it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare NVTS and ONTO with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.