PDM vs REG Stock Comparison
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. vs Regency Centers Corporation
PDM leads
PDM leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors REG on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support PDM, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
Regency Centers Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PDM over REG, 52 versus 48 as of Sep 5, 2026. PDM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while REG holds the stronger risk resilience profile. PDM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors REG. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. PDM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. and Regency Centers Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare PDM and REG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%73 vs 43PDM +30
- Risk Resilience15%50 vs 77REG +27
- Momentum25%68 vs 43PDM +25
- Quality30%20 vs 43REG +23
3 of 6 evidence groups favor PDM. PDM’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; REG keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
No new signals fired.
PDM's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PDM and REG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PDM (Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
REG (Regency Centers Corporation): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PDMPDM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
PDMPDM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PDMPDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points.
Momentum
PDMPDM on the Momentum factor, by 25 points.
Lower downside
REGREG on Risk Resilience, by 27 points.
Analyst upside
REGREG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PDM, analyst targets favor REG. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PDM | REG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +6.7% | +13.8% | REG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +9.7% | +14% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PDM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PDM | 52 vs 48 |
| Fundamentals | REGon balance | revenue growth 0.6% vs 0.3%; EPS growth 11.3% vs -10.3%; TTM ROE -5.4% vs 9.6%; gross margin 28.6% vs 35.1%; operating margin 23.3% vs 40.3% — REG takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PDM | Value 73 vs 43 |
| Technicals | PDM | Price vs 50-day 0.9% vs -4.5%; vs 200-day 14.8% vs 0% |
| Risk Resilience | REG | Risk Resilience 50 vs 77 |
| Analyst expectations | REG | Target upside 6.7% vs 13.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PDM and REG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PDM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3PDM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PDM +4
- 52 vs 48
- 7 sessions ago
- PDM +5
- 52 vs 47
- 30 sessions ago
- PDM +4
- 49 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- REG +4
- 49 vs 53
The lead changed hands 11 times in this window, most recently on Sep 2 when PDM moved ahead of REG.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.65%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (3.88%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.42%)
PDM leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.1%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.87%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1REG closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge.
- 2REG's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3PDM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
REG leads on balance| Metric | PDM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 11.3% | -10.3% |
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 35.1% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 40.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.4% | 9.6% |
| Debt to equity | 1.54 | 0.8 |
Technicals
PDM has the stronger structure| Metric | PDM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.4 | 43 |
| ADX (14) | 11.9 | 25.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.9% | -4.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 14.8% | 0% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 21.3% | 12.2% |
Risk
REG is the more resilient| Metric | PDM | REG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.04 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.43 | 0.15 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 0.24 |
| Max drawdown | -29.5% | -9.6% |
| Current drawdown | -2.7% | -8.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 31.2% | 15.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.2% | -1.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PDM or REG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PDM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 52 against REG's 48. The edge comes from value and momentum. REG is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PDM or REG the better buy right now?
PDM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PDM over REG?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. PDM leads Value by 30 points; REG leads Risk Resilience by 27 points; PDM leads Momentum by 25 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PDM or REG?
Analyst price targets imply +6.7% upside for PDM and +13.8% for REG, so the Street currently favors REG. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PDM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PDM or REG?
PDM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PDM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 30 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PDM or REG?
PDM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PDM or REG?
PDM on the Momentum factor, by 25 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PDM or REG?
REG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. REG on Risk Resilience, by 27 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PDM more profitable than REG?
REG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28.6% vs 35.1%; operating margin 23.3% vs 40.3%; ttm roe -5.4% vs 9.6%.
Is PDM's lead over REG getting stronger or weaker?
PDM lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has changed hands 11 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-02, when PDM moved ahead of REG.
What would change the PDM vs REG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: REG closes the Value gap — currently 30 points behind, the largest single contributor to PDM's edge; REG's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; PDM's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about PDM and REG?
PDM: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. REG: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on PDM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On REG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PDM and REG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.