PNC vs ROK Stock Comparison
ROK currently leads PNC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 58 vs 57. The clearest difference is quality, while PNC has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between PNC and ROK?
ROK leads the current stock comparison as Rockwell Automation, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. vs Rockwell Automation, Inc.
ROK leads
ROK leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, but the lead has narrowed from 16 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors PNC on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support ROK, its lead is narrowing, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ROK over PNC, 58 versus 57 as of Oct 31, 2026. ROK's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while PNC holds the stronger value profile. ROK also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PNC. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ROK today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. ROK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
Compare The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare PNC and ROK against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality53 vs 72ROK +19
- Value53 vs 38PNC +15
- Risk Resilience66 vs 51PNC +15
- Momentum61 vs 71ROK +10
1 of 6 evidence groups favor ROK. ROK’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; PNC keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +10
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
The lead changed hands: ROK moved ahead of PNC in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — PNC and ROK both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ROK (Rockwell Automation, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
PNC (The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, risk resilience, fundamentals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ROKROK on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ROKROK on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PNCPNC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
ROKROK on the Momentum factor, by 10 points.
Lower downside
PNCPNC on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
PNCPNC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ROK, analyst targets favor PNC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | PNC | ROK | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +19.3% | +12.7% | PNC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +23.9% | +24.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 15 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | PNC | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 7.49% | 5.15% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $4.600 | $4.130 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $6.600 | $5.310 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #166 | #246 |
PNC grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.49% a year against ROK's 5.15%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ROK. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 58 |
| Fundamentals | PNCon balance | revenue growth 3.8% vs 3.3%; EPS growth 3.5% vs 17%; TTM ROE 12.6% vs 33.3%; gross margin 68.6% vs 54.5%; operating margin 27.2% vs 21.7% — PNC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PNC | Value 53 vs 38 |
| Technicals | ROK | Price vs 50-day -1.2% vs 1.3%; vs 200-day -0.2% vs 4% |
| Risk Resilience | PNC | Risk Resilience 66 vs 51 |
| Analyst expectations | PNC | Target upside 19.3% vs 12.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of PNC and ROK and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ROK.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28ROK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 1 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ROK +1
- 57 vs 58
- 7 sessions ago
- PNC +9
- 55 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- ROK +16
- 47 vs 63
- 90 sessions ago
- Level
- 49 vs 49
The lead changed hands 9 times in this window, most recently on Oct 28 when ROK moved ahead of PNC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
4 bullish / 0 bearish
Only ROK
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.71%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.37%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PNC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to ROK's edge.
- 2PNC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3ROK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 15 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate ROK's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PNC leads on balance| Metric | PNC | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 3.5% | 17% |
| Gross margin | 68.6% | 54.5% |
| Operating margin | 27.2% | 21.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 12.6% | 33.3% |
| Debt to equity | 1.28 | 1.03 |
Performance
ROK leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | PNC | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -8.2% | -5.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 4.4% | 10.9% |
| Year to date | 9.4% | 14.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 22.4% | 24.5% |
Technicals
ROK has the stronger structure| Metric | PNC | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 66.1 | 57 |
| ADX (14) | 28.1 | 13.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.2% | 1.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.2% | 4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 14.9% | 25.3% |
Risk
PNC is the more resilient| Metric | PNC | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.55 | 1.39 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.98 | 0.69 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.4 | 1.05 |
| Max drawdown | -17.2% | -19% |
| Current drawdown | -11.2% | -10.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 21% | 31.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.1% | -2.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, PNC or ROK?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ROK is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 58 against PNC's 57. The edge comes from quality and momentum. PNC is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is PNC or ROK the better buy right now?
ROK carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ROK over PNC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ROK leads Quality by 19 points; PNC leads Value by 15 points; PNC leads Risk Resilience by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, PNC or ROK?
Analyst price targets imply +19.3% upside for PNC and +12.7% for ROK, so the Street currently favors PNC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ROK. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, PNC or ROK?
PNC is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PNC on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, PNC or ROK?
ROK on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, PNC or ROK?
ROK on the Momentum factor, by 10 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, PNC or ROK?
PNC is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PNC on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is PNC more profitable than ROK?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 68.6% vs 54.5%; operating margin 27.2% vs 21.7%; ttm roe 12.6% vs 33.3%. PNC leads on two measures and ROK on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is ROK's lead over PNC getting stronger or weaker?
ROK lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 16 to 1 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 9 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-28, when ROK moved ahead of PNC.
What would change the PNC vs ROK verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PNC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to ROK's edge; PNC generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; ROK's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 15 points over 30 sessions, and a further 1-point move would eliminate ROK's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about PNC and ROK?
PNC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. ROK: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on PNC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On ROK it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare PNC and ROK with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.