TECK vs TX Stock Comparison
TX currently leads TECK in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 52 vs 48. The clearest difference is value, while TECK has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between TECK and TX?
TX leads the current stock comparison as Ternium S.A., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Teck Resources Limited vs Ternium S.A.
TX leads
TX leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 7 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors TECK on target upside.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Teck Resources Limited
Ternium S.A.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TX over TECK, 52 versus 48 as of Oct 31, 2026. TX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while TECK holds the stronger quality profile. TX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TECK. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. TX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Teck Resources Limited and Ternium S.A. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare TECK and TX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value48 vs 67TX +19
- Risk Resilience53 vs 66TX +13
- Quality50 vs 40TECK +10
- Momentum44 vs 40TECK +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TX. TX’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; TECK keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
TX's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TECK and TX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TX (Ternium S.A.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
TECK (Teck Resources Limited): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 43.8% against 37.3%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TXTX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TXTX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TXTX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points.
Momentum
TECKTECK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
TXTX on Risk Resilience, by 13 points.
Analyst upside
TECKTECK on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TX, analyst targets favor TECK. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TECK | TX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +12.2% | +8.3% | TECK has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +35% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | TECK | TX |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 19.20% | 17.61% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.150 | $1.200 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.360 | $2.700 |
| Years increased | 3 | 3 |
| No cut in window | No (2) | No (2) |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
TECK grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 19.20% a year against TX's 17.61%.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TX | 48 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | TECKon balance | revenue growth -8.5% vs 10.3%; EPS growth 4.8% vs 63.6%; TTM ROE 9.6% vs 5.8%; gross margin 34.9% vs 17.4%; operating margin 29.3% vs 7.5% — TECK takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TX | Value 48 vs 67 |
| Technicals | TX | Price vs 50-day -8.6% vs -6.5%; vs 200-day 4.4% vs 13.5% |
| Risk Resilience | TX | Risk Resilience 53 vs 66 |
| Analyst expectations | TECK | Target upside 12.2% vs 8.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TECK and TX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28TX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TX +4
- 48 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- TX +10
- 43 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- TX +7
- 50 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- TX +5
- 57 vs 62
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only TX
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
TX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -4.88%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TECK closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to TX's edge.
- 2TECK's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate TX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TECK leads on balance| Metric | TECK | TX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -8.5% | 10.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 4.8% | 63.6% |
| Gross margin | 34.9% | 17.4% |
| Operating margin | 29.3% | 7.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 9.6% | 5.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.35 | 0.24 |
Performance
TX leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | TECK | TX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.4% | -8.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -4.2% | -0.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 0.9% | 9.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 12.1% | 26.1% |
| Year to date | 31.6% | 41.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 48.3% | 50.1% |
Technicals
TX has the stronger structure| Metric | TECK | TX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.6 | 42.1 |
| ADX (14) | 12.7 | 23.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -8.6% | -6.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | 4.4% | 13.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 43.8% | 37.3% |
Risk
TX is the more resilient| Metric | TECK | TX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.23 | 1.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.96 | 1.14 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Max drawdown | -26.2% | -18.9% |
| Current drawdown | -12.4% | -9.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 46.3% | 32.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.3% | -3.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TECK or TX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TX is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 52 against TECK's 48. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. TECK is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TECK or TX the better buy right now?
TX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TX over TECK?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TX leads Value by 19 points; TX leads Risk Resilience by 13 points; TECK leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TECK or TX?
Analyst price targets imply +12.2% upside for TECK and +8.3% for TX, so the Street currently favors TECK. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TECK or TX?
TX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 19 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TECK or TX?
TX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TECK or TX?
TECK on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TECK or TX?
TX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TX on Risk Resilience, by 13 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TECK more profitable than TX?
TECK leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 34.9% vs 17.4%; operating margin 29.3% vs 7.5%; ttm roe 9.6% vs 5.8%.
Is TX's lead over TECK getting stronger or weaker?
TX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 7 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the TECK vs TX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TECK closes the Value gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to TX's edge; TECK's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate TX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about TECK and TX?
TECK: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TX: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TECK is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TECK and TX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.