UMH vs VICI Stock Comparison
VICI currently leads UMH in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 48. The clearest difference is quality, while UMH has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between UMH and VICI?
VICI leads the current stock comparison as VICI Properties Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
UMH Properties, Inc. vs VICI Properties Inc.
VICI leads
VICI leads by 9 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support VICI, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
UMH Properties, Inc.
VICI Properties Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VICI over UMH, 57 versus 48 as of Oct 21, 2026. VICI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while UMH holds the stronger risk resilience profile. VICI also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VICI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. VICI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
Compare UMH Properties, Inc. and VICI Properties Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare UMH and VICI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience75 vs 55UMH +20
- Quality43 vs 61VICI +18
- Value47 vs 60VICI +13
- Momentum41 vs 48VICI +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor VICI. VICI’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; UMH keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +9
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
VICI's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — UMH and VICI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VICI (VICI Properties Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
UMH (UMH Properties, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VICIVICI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
UMHUMH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
VICIVICI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points.
Momentum
VICIVICI on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
UMHUMH on Risk Resilience, by 20 points.
Analyst upside
VICIVICI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | UMH | VICI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +18.2% | +26.4% | VICI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +2.8% | +20.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | UMH | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.33% | 7.06% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.720 | $1.255 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.890 | $1.765 |
| Years increased | 5 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #19 | #14 |
VICI grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.06% a year against UMH's 4.33%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VICI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | VICI | 48 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | VICIon balance | revenue growth 8.8% vs 3.9%; EPS growth 66.7% vs -41.5%; TTM ROE 3.5% vs 9.8%; gross margin 51.4% vs 99.3%; operating margin 17.9% vs 88.8% — VICI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | VICI | Value 47 vs 60 |
| Technicals | UMH | Price vs 50-day -4.8% vs -5.6%; vs 200-day -0.8% vs -13.8% |
| Risk Resilience | UMH | Risk Resilience 75 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | VICI | Target upside 18.2% vs 26.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of UMH and VICI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 9 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VICI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VICI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- VICI +9
- 48 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- VICI +7
- 48 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- VICI +3
- 48 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- UMH +2
- 53 vs 51
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Aug 25 when UMH moved ahead of VICI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
Only UMH
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.85%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VICI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (10.61%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
VICI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.34%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.94%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1UMH closes the Quality gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to VICI's edge.
- 2UMH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3VICI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
VICI leads on balance| Metric | UMH | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.8% | 3.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 66.7% | -41.5% |
| Gross margin | 51.4% | 99.3% |
| Operating margin | 17.9% | 88.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 3.5% | 9.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.89 | 0.61 |
Performance
UMH leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | UMH | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | 2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -2.7% | -2.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.7% | -12.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -1.5% | -17.8% |
| Year to date | -3.3% | -16.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 8.2% | -24% |
Technicals
UMH has the stronger structure| Metric | UMH | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.5 | 57.4 |
| ADX (14) | 19.8 | 33.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.8% | -5.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.8% | -13.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 17.9% | 17.6% |
Risk
UMH is the more resilient| Metric | UMH | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.11 | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | -1.61 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.44 | -2.41 |
| Max drawdown | -14.8% | -28.3% |
| Current drawdown | -7.7% | -25.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 19.8% | 18.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, UMH or VICI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VICI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against UMH's 48. The edge comes from quality and value. UMH is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is UMH or VICI the better buy right now?
VICI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VICI over UMH?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. UMH leads Risk Resilience by 20 points; VICI leads Quality by 18 points; VICI leads Value by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, UMH or VICI?
Analyst price targets imply +18.2% upside for UMH and +26.4% for VICI, so the Street currently favors VICI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, UMH or VICI?
VICI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. VICI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 13 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, UMH or VICI?
UMH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, UMH or VICI?
VICI on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, UMH or VICI?
UMH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. UMH on Risk Resilience, by 20 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is UMH more profitable than VICI?
VICI leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 51.4% vs 99.3%; operating margin 17.9% vs 88.8%; ttm roe 3.5% vs 9.8%.
Is VICI's lead over UMH getting stronger or weaker?
VICI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 9 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-25, when UMH moved ahead of VICI.
What would change the UMH vs VICI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: UMH closes the Quality gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to VICI's edge; UMH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; VICI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about UMH and VICI?
UMH: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. VICI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on UMH is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On VICI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare UMH and VICI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.