AIV vs VICI Stock Comparison
VICI currently leads AIV in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 55. The clearest difference is momentum, while AIV has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between AIV and VICI?
VICI leads the current stock comparison as VICI Properties Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Apartment Investment and Management Company vs VICI Properties Inc.
VICI leads
VICI leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from AIV. Wall Street currently favors AIV on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support VICI, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Apartment Investment and Management Company
VICI Properties Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors VICI over AIV, 57 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. VICI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while AIV holds the stronger quality profile. VICI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AIV. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VICI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. VICI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VICI now leads by 2.
Compare Apartment Investment and Management Company and VICI Properties Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AIV and VICI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 48VICI +23
- Quality80 vs 61AIV +19
- Risk Resilience38 vs 55VICI +17
- Value63 vs 60Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor VICI. VICI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; AIV keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
VICI's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AIV and VICI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
VICI (VICI Properties Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
AIV (Apartment Investment and Management Company): the counter-case, on quality, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 35% against 17.6%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
VICIVICI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
VICIVICI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
VICIVICI on the Momentum factor, by 23 points.
Lower downside
VICIVICI on Risk Resilience, by 17 points.
Analyst upside
AIVAIV on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors VICI, analyst targets favor AIV. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AIV | VICI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +521.1% | +26.4% | AIV has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +20.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor VICI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 55 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -40% vs -41.5%; TTM ROE 105% vs 9.8%; gross margin 51.2% vs 99.3%; operating margin -84.2% vs 88.8% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 63 vs 60 |
| Technicals | VICI | Price vs 50-day -28.1% vs -5.6%; vs 200-day -54.8% vs -13.8% |
| Risk Resilience | VICI | Risk Resilience 38 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | AIV | Target upside 521.1% vs 26.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AIV and VICI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on VICI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20VICI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VICI now leads by 2.
- Today
- VICI +2
- 55 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 55 vs 55
- 30 sessions ago
- AIV +5
- 56 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- AIV +10
- 61 vs 51
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 30 when AIV moved ahead of VICI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AIV
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.50%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only VICI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active.
VICI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.59%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -0.94%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AIV closes the Momentum gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to VICI's edge.
- 2AIV's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3VICI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AIV | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | 3.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -40% | -41.5% |
| Gross margin | 51.2% | 99.3% |
| Operating margin | -84.2% | 88.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 105% | 9.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.86 | 0.61 |
Performance
VICI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AIV | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.5% | 2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22.7% | -2.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -36.3% | -12.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -59.9% | -17.8% |
| Year to date | -71.7% | -16.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -69.9% | -24% |
Technicals
VICI has the stronger structure| Metric | AIV | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 18.4 | 57.4 |
| ADX (14) | 72.5 | 33.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -28.1% | -5.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -54.8% | -13.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35% | 17.6% |
Risk
VICI is the more resilient| Metric | AIV | VICI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.3 | 0 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.65 | -1.61 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.36 | -2.41 |
| Max drawdown | -72.5% | -28.3% |
| Current drawdown | -72.2% | -25.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 42.7% | 18.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AIV or VICI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, VICI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against AIV's 55. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. AIV is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AIV or VICI the better buy right now?
VICI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor VICI over AIV?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. VICI leads Momentum by 23 points; AIV leads Quality by 19 points; VICI leads Risk Resilience by 17 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AIV or VICI?
Analyst price targets imply +521.1% upside for AIV and +26.4% for VICI, so the Street currently favors AIV. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors VICI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AIV or VICI?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AIV or VICI?
VICI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AIV or VICI?
VICI on the Momentum factor, by 23 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AIV or VICI?
VICI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. VICI on Risk Resilience, by 17 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AIV more profitable than VICI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 51.2% vs 99.3%; operating margin -84.2% vs 88.8%; ttm roe 105% vs 9.8%. AIV leads on one measure and VICI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is VICI's lead over AIV getting stronger or weaker?
VICI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; VICI now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-30, when AIV moved ahead of VICI.
What would change the AIV vs VICI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AIV closes the Momentum gap — currently 23 points behind, the largest single contributor to VICI's edge; AIV's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; VICI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AIV and VICI?
AIV: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. VICI: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AIV is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On VICI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AIV and VICI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.