WEX vs XP Stock Comparison
Compare WEX and XP across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between WEX and XP?
XP leads the current stock comparison as XP Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
WEX Inc. vs XP Inc.
XP leads
XP leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from WEX.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support XP, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors XP over WEX, 59 versus 57 as of Sep 11, 2026. XP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while WEX holds the stronger value profile. XP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor XP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. XP lead: Reversed — WEX led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; XP now leads by 2.
Compare WEX Inc. and XP Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare WEX and XP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum46 vs 79XP +33
- Value72 vs 57WEX +15
- Risk Resilience53 vs 43WEX +10
- Quality54 vs 52Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor XP. XP’s edge is concentrated in momentum; WEX keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
XP's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — WEX and XP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
XP (XP Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
WEX (WEX Inc.): the counter-case, on value, risk resilience, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
XPXP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
WEXWEX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
WEXWEX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points.
Momentum
XPXP on the Momentum factor, by 33 points.
Lower downside
WEXWEX on Risk Resilience, by 10 points.
Analyst upside
XPXP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | WEX | XP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -6.3% | +10.8% | XP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37.9% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor XP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 59 |
| Fundamentals | WEXon balance | revenue growth 11.8% vs 8.2%; EPS growth 39.1% vs 12.5%; TTM ROE 28.2% vs 22.1%; gross margin 56.7% vs 66.7%; operating margin 25.5% vs 31.8% — WEX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | WEX | Value 72 vs 57 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day 6.5% vs 16.4%; vs 200-day 19.6% vs 10.6% |
| Risk Resilience | WEX | Risk Resilience 53 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | XP | Target upside -6.3% vs 10.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of WEX and XP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on XP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10XP lead: Reversed — WEX led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; XP now leads by 2.
- Today
- XP +2
- 57 vs 59
- 7 sessions ago
- WEX +1
- 61 vs 60
- 30 sessions ago
- WEX +9
- 62 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- WEX +14
- 67 vs 53
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 8 when XP moved ahead of WEX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (13.19%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (5.87%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
XP leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.78%, AIQ +1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.55%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1WEX closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to XP's edge.
- 2WEX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3XP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
WEX leads on balance| Metric | WEX | XP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.8% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 39.1% | 12.5% |
| Gross margin | 56.7% | 66.7% |
| Operating margin | 25.5% | 31.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 28.2% | 22.1% |
| Debt to equity | 3.98 | 3.74 |
Performance
WEX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | WEX | XP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.5% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0% | 24.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 38.4% | 30.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 18.4% | 0.1% |
| Year to date | 27.6% | 22% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 10.2% | 7.8% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | WEX | XP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.1 | 80.8 |
| ADX (14) | 25.4 | 30.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 6.5% | 16.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 19.6% | 10.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 34.3% | 46.2% |
Risk
WEX is the more resilient| Metric | WEX | XP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.5 | 1.82 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.45 | 0.54 |
| Max drawdown | -31.4% | -34.9% |
| Current drawdown | -6.5% | -13% |
| Annualized volatility | 40.3% | 46.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.4% | -4.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, WEX or XP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, XP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 59 against WEX's 57. The edge comes from momentum. WEX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is WEX or XP the better buy right now?
XP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor XP over WEX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. XP leads Momentum by 33 points; WEX leads Value by 15 points; WEX leads Risk Resilience by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, WEX or XP?
Analyst price targets imply -6.3% upside for WEX and +10.8% for XP, so the Street currently favors XP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, WEX or XP?
WEX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. WEX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 15 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, WEX or XP?
WEX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, WEX or XP?
XP on the Momentum factor, by 33 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, WEX or XP?
WEX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. WEX on Risk Resilience, by 10 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is WEX more profitable than XP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 56.7% vs 66.7%; operating margin 25.5% vs 31.8%; ttm roe 28.2% vs 22.1%. WEX leads on one measure and XP on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is XP's lead over WEX getting stronger or weaker?
XP lead: Reversed — WEX led by 9 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; XP now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-08, when XP moved ahead of WEX.
What would change the WEX vs XP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: WEX closes the Momentum gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to XP's edge; WEX generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; XP's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about WEX and XP?
WEX: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. XP: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on WEX is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On XP it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare WEX and XP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.