Current etf page

ETF Analytics

CGDV ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Relative Leader / Watch

Strong Relative Position

NeutralEdge 8/10
$49.18+$0.01 (+0.02%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    52
  • Value
    55
  • Quality
    66
  • Risk resilience
    85
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

CGDV Holdings

58 holdings; the ten largest make up 23.41% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
58
Top 10 weight
23.41%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
AVGO
4.63%
Expense ratio
0.33%
$33.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$39.79B
Top sector
Technology
37.84%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1MSFTMICROSOFT CORP COMMON STOCK USD.000006257.54%$2.89B
2NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK USD.0016.42%$2.46B
3METAMETA PLATFORMS INC CLASS A COMMON STOCK USD.0000064.88%$1.87B
4AVGOBROADCOM INC COMMON STOCK4.63%$1.77B
5GOOGLALPHABET INC CL A COMMON STOCK USD.0013.54%$1.36B
6ORCLORACLE CORP COMMON STOCK USD.013.45%$1.32B
70I1W.LROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD COMMON STOCK USD.013.10%$1.19B
8RTXRTX CORP COMMON STOCK USD1.03.06%$1.17B
9GEGENERAL ELECTRIC COMMON STOCK USD.012.99%$1.15B
10CMCSACOMCAST CORP CLASS A COMMON STOCK USD.012.67%$1.02B
11CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC COMMON STOCK USD.0012.57%$983.87M
12CARRCARRIER GLOBAL CORP COMMON STOCK USD.012.34%$896.3M
13SBUXSTARBUCKS CORP COMMON STOCK USD.0012.31%$887.08M
14AAPLAPPLE INC COMMON STOCK USD.000012.31%$886.47M
15UNPUNION PACIFIC CORP COMMON STOCK USD2.52.27%$870.58M
16BATS.LBRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO PLC COMMON STOCK2.27%$869.68M
17JPMJPMORGAN CHASE + CO COMMON STOCK USD1.02.21%$845.68M
18TSMTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR SP ADR ADR2.20%$842.89M
19AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON STOCK USD.012.17%$832.62M
20AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC COMMON STOCK USD.011.86%$712.5M
21LIN.DELINDE PLC COMMON STOCK1.83%$703.02M
22LLYELI LILLY + CO COMMON STOCK1.82%$698.07M
23IPINTERNATIONAL PAPER CO COMMON STOCK USD1.01.64%$627.79M
24ABBVABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK USD.011.56%$597.48M
25PMPHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL COMMON STOCK1.48%$567.39M

CGDV Expense Ratio

CGDV charges 0.33% a year, about $33.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$33.00
$25,000$82.50
$100,000$330.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$49.18
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$39.79B
Expense ratio
0.33%
Distribution yield
1.23%
Capital Group ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
58
NAV
$49.02
Average volume
3.47M
Inception
Feb 22, 2022
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Technology (37.84%)
Beta
0.9
Momentum score
52/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
IssuerCapital Group
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureTechnology (37.84%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateFeb 22, 2022
Websitehttps://www.capitalgroup.com/advisor/investments/exchange-traded-funds/details/cgdv

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$39.79B
Expense ratio0.33%
Holdings count58
NAV$49.02
Average volume3.47M
Distribution yield1.23%
Beta0.9

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Communication Services11.44%
Financial Services5.13%
Basic Materials4.17%
Technology37.84%
Cash & Others2.69%
Utilities0.89%
Energy3.69%
Consumer Cyclical8.13%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Canada1.89%
Taiwan (Province of China)2.13%
Ireland2.47%
United Kingdom4.43%
Singapore0.89%
Other0.15%
United States88.04%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
62/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.99

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-9.75%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
52/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
55/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
85/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
12.49%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read CGDV's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to CGDV AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

CGDV ETF Analytics FAQ

What is CGDV's expense ratio?

CGDV's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is CGDV's dividend yield?

CGDV's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is CGDV?

CGDV's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is CGDV overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.