Current etf page

ETF Analytics

SOXX Holdings: Top Semiconductor Stocks, Weights and Expense Ratio

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

SOXXiShares Semiconductor ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

BearishEdge 2/10
$510.36+$10.35 (+2.07%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    15
  • Value
    25
  • Quality
    70
  • Risk resilience
    23
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

SOXX answer

SOXX, the iShares Semiconductor ETF, holds 33 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. Its largest positions are NVDA (9.2%), MU (9.2%), AMD (8.7%), AVGO (7.1%), INTC (5.8%), and the top ten make up 62.6% of the fund. SOXX's expense ratio is 0.33%: about $33.00 a year for every $10,000 invested.

Largest holdings
NVDA, MU, AMD
Top 10 weight
62.6%
Holdings
33
Expense ratio
0.33%
Fund size
$40.55B
Top countries
United States (84.2%), Netherlands (4.8%), Taiwan (4.7%)
Data as of Oct 21, 2026 · Market close

SOXX Holdings

33 holdings; the ten largest make up 62.57% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 11, 2026.

Holdings
33
Top 10 weight
62.57%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
NVDA
9.18%
Expense ratio
0.33%
$33.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$40.55B
Top sector
Semiconductors
83.10%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NVDANVIDIA9.18%$4.17B
2MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY9.17%$4.17B
3AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES8.75%$3.97B
4AVGOBROADCOM INC7.07%$3.21B
5INTCINTEL CORPORATION5.81%$2.64B
6MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY4.97%$2.26B
7TSMTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING4.69%$2.13B
8AMATAPPLIED MATERIAL INC4.51%$2.05B
9LRCXLAM RESEARCH4.30%$1.95B
10KLACKLA4.12%$1.87B
11ADIANALOG DEVICES3.82%$1.74B
12TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENT INC3.71%$1.68B
13TERTERADYNE3.22%$1.46B
14MPWRMONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC3.07%$1.4B
15QCOMQUALCOMM3.04%$1.38B
160EDE.LNXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV3.01%$1.37B
17ASMLASML HOLDING ADR REPRESENTING2.42%$1.1B
18ALABASTERA LABS2.27%$1.03B
19MCHPMICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC2.09%$950.21M
20CRDOCREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING LTD1.50%$680.18M
21ONON SEMICONDUCTOR CORP1.49%$677.19M
22ASXASE TECHNOLOGY HOLDING ADR REPRESE1.34%$608.21M
23ENTGENTEGRIS INC1.17%$530.91M
24MTSIMACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS1.06%$483.51M
25UMCUNITED MICRO ELECTRONICS ADR REP1.02%$464.37M

SOXX Expense Ratio

SOXX charges 0.33% a year, about $33.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$33.00
$25,000$82.50
$100,000$330.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

How the fee compares
FundExpense ratioPer $10,000Comparison
SOXX0.33%$33.00
SMH0.35%$35.00SOXX vs SMH
SOXL0.91%$91.00SOXX vs SOXL

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$510.36
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$40.55B
Expense ratio
0.33%
Distribution yield
0.25%
IShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
33
NAV
$502.00
Average volume
8.75M
Inception
Jul 10, 2001
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Semiconductors (83.10%)
Beta
2.24
Momentum score
15/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameiShares Semiconductor ETF
IssuerIShares
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureSemiconductors (83.10%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJul 10, 2001
Websitehttps://www.ishares.com/us/products/239705/ishares-semiconductor-etf

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$40.55B
Expense ratio0.33%
Holdings count33
NAV$502.00
Average volume8.75M
Distribution yield0.25%
Beta2.24

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Semiconductor Equipment16.85%
Semiconductors83.10%
Cash and/or Derivatives0.06%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Switzerland0.40%
Other0.05%
Netherlands4.75%
Taiwan4.69%
South Korea2.69%
Cayman Islands1.63%
United States84.18%
United Kingdom0.44%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
36/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
1.36

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-29.01%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
15/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
25/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
23/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
46.06%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read SOXX's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to SOXX AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

SOXX Holdings FAQ

What are SOXX's top holdings?

SOXX's largest positions are NVDA (9.2%), MU (9.2%), AMD (8.7%), AVGO (7.1%), INTC (5.8%). The ten largest make up 62.6% of the fund.

How many stocks does SOXX hold?

SOXX holds 33 semiconductor stocks.

SOXX vs SMH: what's the difference?

Both hold chipmakers. SOXX caps its largest positions more tightly, so it is usually less dominated by its top few names than SMH, which weights its biggest holdings more heavily.