Current etf page

ETF Analytics

GPTY ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

GPTYYieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

BearishEdge 1/10
$40.04+$0.26 (+0.65%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    25
  • Value
    36
  • Quality
    34
  • Risk resilience
    35
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

GPTY Holdings

96 holdings; the ten largest make up 48.50% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
96
Top 10 weight
48.50%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
SNOW
6.40%
Expense ratio
1.06%
$106.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$101.43M
Top sector
Technology
77.60%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1SNOWSnowflake Inc6.40%$9.38M
2NVDANVIDIA Corp6.31%$9.25M
3GOOGLAlphabet Inc5.13%$7.52M
4MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.53%$6.65M
5AAPLApple Inc4.50%$6.6M
6PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc4.50%$6.59M
7IBMInternational Business Machines Corp4.45%$6.53M
8AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc4.33%$6.35M
9INTCIntel Corp4.20%$6.16M
10METAMeta Platforms Inc4.14%$6.08M
11AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.04%$5.92M
12MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC3.93%$5.76M
13ANETArista Networks Inc3.75%$5.5M
14AVGOBroadcom Inc3.57%$5.23M
15HUTHUT 8 CORP3.41%$5M
16AIC3.ai Inc3.35%$4.91M
17QCOMQUALCOMM Inc3.25%$4.77M
18NOWServiceNow Inc3.19%$4.68M
19TSLATesla Inc3.04%$4.45M
20TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd2.94%$4.32M
21United States Treasury Bill 12/10/20262.68%$3.92M
22ORCLOracle Corp2.38%$3.49M
23CRWVCoreWeave Inc2.29%$3.36M
24CIFRCipher Digital Inc2.26%$3.31M
25CRMSalesforce Inc1.99%$2.91M

GPTY Expense Ratio

GPTY charges 1.06% a year, about $106.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$106.00
$25,000$265.00
$100,000$1060.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$40.04
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$101.43M
Expense ratio
1.06%
Distribution yield
39.54%
YieldMax ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
96
NAV
$39.59
Average volume
58.39K
Inception
Jan 22, 2025
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Technology (77.60%)
Beta
2.01
Momentum score
25/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameYieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
IssuerYieldMax
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureTechnology (77.60%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJan 22, 2025
Websitehttps://yieldmaxetfs.com/our-etfs/gpty/

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$101.43M
Expense ratio1.06%
Holdings count96
NAV$39.59
Average volume58.39K
Distribution yield39.54%
Beta2.01

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Cash & Others0.01%
Consumer Cyclical7.13%
Communication Services10.23%
Technology77.60%
Industrials1.94%
Financial Services3.09%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Taiwan3.02%
United States97.37%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
32/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-0.62

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-29.77%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
25/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
36/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
35/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
28.18%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read GPTY's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to GPTY AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

GPTY ETF Analytics FAQ

What is GPTY's expense ratio?

GPTY's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is GPTY's dividend yield?

GPTY's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is GPTY?

GPTY's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is GPTY overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.