Current etf page

ETF Analytics

XLU ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 30, 2026

XLUState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Relative Leader / Watch

Strong Relative Position

NeutralEdge 9/10
$43.43+$0.29 (+0.67%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    69
  • Value
    52
  • Quality
    73
  • Risk resilience
    62
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 30, 2026

XLU Holdings

34 holdings; the ten largest make up 58.70% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
34
Top 10 weight
58.70%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
NEE
12.99%
Expense ratio
0.08%
$8.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$24.33B
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NEENEXTERA ENERGY INC12.99%$2.87B
2SOSOUTHERN CO/THE7.48%$1.65B
3DUKDUKE ENERGY CORP7.03%$1.55B
4CEGCONSTELLATION ENERGY6.91%$1.52B
5AEPAMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER5.08%$1.12B
6DDOMINION ENERGY INC4.32%$953.69M
7SRESEMPRA4.15%$915.37M
8ETRENTERGY CORP3.66%$807.06M
9XELXCEL ENERGY INC3.56%$784.78M
10VSTVISTRA CORP3.52%$776.98M
11EXCEXELON CORP3.35%$740.12M
12EDCONSOLIDATED EDISON INC2.97%$655.71M
13PEGPUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GP2.73%$602.11M
14WECWEC ENERGY GROUP INC2.59%$572.05M
15PCGP G + E CORP2.33%$515.07M
16AEEAMEREN CORPORATION2.19%$484.2M
17DTEDTE ENERGY COMPANY2.11%$465.88M
18ATOATMOS ENERGY CORP2.08%$458.61M
19AWKAMERICAN WATER WORKS CO INC2.06%$455.24M
20ESEVERSOURCE ENERGY1.96%$432.53M
21PPLPPL CORP1.95%$429.06M
22CNPCENTERPOINT ENERGY INC1.93%$426.62M
23FEFIRSTENERGY CORP1.82%$401.38M
24NRGNRG ENERGY INC1.78%$392.7M
25EIXEDISON INTERNATIONAL1.65%$364.04M

XLU Expense Ratio

XLU charges 0.08% a year, about $8.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$8.00
$25,000$20.00
$100,000$80.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$43.43
As of Oct 30, 2026
Fund size
$24.33B
Expense ratio
0.08%
Distribution yield
2.83%
SPDR ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
34
NAV
$43.15
Average volume
23.76M
Inception
Dec 16, 1998
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Utilities (100.00%)
Beta
0.49
Momentum score
69/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameState Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
IssuerSPDR
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureUtilities (100.00%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateDec 16, 1998
Websitehttps://www.ssga.com/us/en/institutional/etfs/state-street-utilities-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlu

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$24.33B
Expense ratio0.08%
Holdings count34
NAV$43.15
Average volume23.76M
Distribution yield2.83%
Beta0.49

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Utilities100.00%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States100.00%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
64/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-0.45

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-17.77%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
69/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
52/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
62/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
15.70%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read XLU's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to XLU AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

XLU ETF Analytics FAQ

What is XLU's expense ratio?

XLU's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is XLU's dividend yield?

XLU's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is XLU?

XLU's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is XLU overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.