Current etf page

ETF Analytics

TQQQ ETF Analytics

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Sep 4, 2026

TQQQ

ETF Analytics
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
Financial Services· Asset Management
AIQ Score
NeutralAIQ Edge 3/10
Low Priority
Relative Laggard
Score data as of Sep 4, 2026
Last price
$72.37
+$0.34 (+0.47%)
Latest market quote
Momentum53
Value28
Quality77
Risk Resilience15
Sentiment
View financial data

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$72.37
As of Sep 4, 2026
Fund size
$35.06B
Expense ratio
0.97%
Distribution yield
0.38%
ProShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
123
NAV
$69.60
Average volume
49.28M
Inception
Feb 9, 2010
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Basic Materials (1.01%)
Beta
3.71
Momentum score
53/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameProShares UltraPro QQQ
IssuerProShares
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureBasic Materials (1.01%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateFeb 9, 2010
Websitehttps://www.proshares.com/our-etfs/leveraged-and-inverse/tqqq

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$35.06B
Expense ratio0.97%
Holdings count123
NAV$69.60
Average volume49.28M
Distribution yield0.38%
Beta3.71

Top Holdings

117 reported holdings; top five weight 66.89%.

SymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
TQQQNet Other Assets (Liabilities)26.63%$9.64B
IQMMPROSHARES GENIUS MNY MKT ETF18.02%$6.52B
TQQQTREASURY BILL16.09%$5.82B
NVDANVIDIA CORP3.34%$1.21B
AAPLAPPLE INC2.81%$1.02B
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP2.22%$803.99M
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1.90%$685.58M
AMZNAMAZON.COM INC1.66%$602.23M
TQQQUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BILL ZERO CPN 29/DEC/2026 USD 1001.64%$592.87M
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES1.29%$465.7M

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights from ETF snapshot data where available.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Basic Materials1.01%
Cash & Others0.01%
Communication Services13.56%
Consumer Cyclical11.21%
Consumer Defensive6.66%
Energy0.54%
Financial Services0.23%
Healthcare3.80%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States69.94%
Other28.04%
United Kingdom0.62%
Netherlands0.49%
Canada0.36%
Singapore0.30%
Uruguay0.17%
Ireland0.09%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
47/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
1.01

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-37.17%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
53/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
28/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
15/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
58.50%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read TQQQ's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to TQQQ AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

TQQQ ETF Analytics FAQ

What is TQQQ's expense ratio?

TQQQ's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is TQQQ's dividend yield?

TQQQ's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is TQQQ?

TQQQ's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is TQQQ overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.