Current etf page

ETF Analytics

XLK Holdings: Top Technology Stocks, Weights and Expense Ratio

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 22, 2026

XLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

NeutralEdge 3/10
$182.38−$6.16 (−3.27%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    30
  • Value
    31
  • Quality
    73
  • Risk resilience
    61
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 22, 2026

XLK answer

XLK, the Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund, holds the 76 technology companies in the S&P 500. Its largest positions are NVDA (14.3%), AAPL (13.0%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.6%), AMD (4.2%), and the top ten make up 61.2% of the fund. XLK's expense ratio is 0.08%.

Largest holdings
NVDA, AAPL, MSFT
Top 10 weight
61.2%
Holdings
76
Expense ratio
0.08%
Fund size
$123.91B
1Y price return
+29.9%
Data as of Oct 22, 2026 · Market close

XLK Holdings

76 holdings; the ten largest make up 61.20% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
76
Top 10 weight
61.20%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
NVDA
14.31%
Expense ratio
0.08%
$8.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$123.91B
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NVDANVIDIA CORP14.31%$17.23B
2AAPLAPPLE INC12.98%$15.62B
3MSFTMICROSOFT CORP9.90%$11.91B
4AVGOBROADCOM INC4.62%$5.56B
5AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES4.23%$5.1B
6MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC4.11%$4.94B
7INTCINTEL CORP3.27%$3.94B
8CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC2.80%$3.37B
9PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A2.52%$3.03B
10LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP2.46%$2.96B
11AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC2.38%$2.87B
12PANWPALO ALTO NETWORKS INC1.81%$2.18B
13ORCLORACLE CORP1.71%$2.06B
14SNDKSANDISK CORP1.66%$1.99B
15TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.56%$1.87B
16KLACKLA CORP1.53%$1.84B
17IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.45%$1.75B
18CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A1.41%$1.69B
19CRMSALESFORCE INC1.31%$1.58B
20MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC1.31%$1.58B
21APHAMPHENOL CORP CL A1.30%$1.57B
22ANETARISTA NETWORKS INC1.29%$1.55B
23STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS1.28%$1.54B
24QCOMQUALCOMM INC1.23%$1.48B
25ADIANALOG DEVICES INC1.17%$1.4B

XLK Expense Ratio

XLK charges 0.08% a year, about $8.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$8.00
$25,000$20.00
$100,000$80.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

How the fee compares
FundExpense ratioPer $10,000Comparison
XLK0.08%$8.00
QQQ0.18%$18.00XLK vs QQQ
VGT0.09%$9.00XLK vs VGT
SMH0.35%$35.00XLK vs SMH

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$182.38
As of Oct 22, 2026
Fund size
$123.91B
Expense ratio
0.08%
Distribution yield
0.45%
SPDR ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
76
NAV
$185.42
Average volume
8.55M
Inception
Dec 16, 1998
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Technology (99.86%)
Beta
1.35
Momentum score
30/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
IssuerSPDR
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureTechnology (99.86%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateDec 16, 1998
Websitehttps://www.ssga.com/us/en/institutional/etfs/state-street-technology-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlk

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$123.91B
Expense ratio0.08%
Holdings count76
NAV$185.42
Average volume8.55M
Distribution yield0.45%
Beta1.35

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Cash & Others0.03%
Technology99.86%
Energy0.11%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Ireland1.17%
United States98.49%
Other0.00%
Netherlands0.34%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
48/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
1

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-16.15%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
30/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
31/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
61/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
26.57%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read XLK's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to XLK AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

XLK Holdings FAQ

What are XLK's top holdings?

XLK's largest positions are NVDA (14.3%), AAPL (13.0%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.6%), AMD (4.2%). The ten largest make up 61.2% of the fund.

How many stocks are in XLK?

XLK holds 76 stocks: the technology companies in the S&P 500.

What is XLK's expense ratio?

XLK's expense ratio is 0.08% a year.