Current etf page

ETF Analytics

BAI ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

BAIiShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

BearishEdge 2/10
$42.89+$0.79 (+1.88%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    31
  • Value
    29
  • Quality
    64
  • Risk resilience
    21
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

BAI Holdings

56 holdings; the ten largest make up 42.13% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 11, 2026.

Holdings
56
Top 10 weight
42.13%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
MU
6.66%
Expense ratio
0.65%
$65.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$12.98B
Top sector
Information Technology
88.94%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY6.66%$962.63M
2NVDANVIDIA5.31%$768.1M
3AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES4.82%$696.32M
4AVGOBROADCOM INC4.68%$676.29M
5TSMTAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING4.66%$673.58M
6LRCXLAM RESEARCH4.20%$607.65M
7LITELUMENTUM HOLDINGS3.00%$433.72M
8SNOWSNOWFLAKE2.94%$425.73M
9INTCINTEL CORPORATION2.93%$423.97M
10SPCXSPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR2.93%$423.16M
11WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORP2.74%$396.66M
122383.TWELITE MATERIAL2.68%$387.77M
13SNDKSANDISK2.54%$366.79M
143017.TWASIA VITAL COMPONENTS2.43%$351.45M
15GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A2.38%$344.16M
16MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY2.37%$342.54M
17ANETARISTA NETWORKS2.14%$309.92M
18MSFTMICROSOFT2.07%$298.94M
19TSEM.TATOWER SEMICONDUCTOR2.00%$289.84M
203037.TWUNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY2.00%$289.58M
21AMZNAMAZON.COM INC1.97%$284.62M
222308.TWDELTA ELECTRONICS1.94%$280.3M
23CRWVCOREWEAVE CLASS A1.89%$273.78M
24000660.KSSK HYNIX1.88%$272.12M
25CRWDCROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A1.79%$259.44M

BAI Expense Ratio

BAI charges 0.65% a year, about $65.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$65.00
$25,000$162.50
$100,000$650.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$42.89
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$12.98B
Expense ratio
0.65%
Distribution yield
1.41%
IShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
56
NAV
$42.04
Average volume
3.74M
Inception
Oct 21, 2024
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Information Technology (88.94%)
Beta
2.33
Momentum score
31/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameiShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
IssuerIShares
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureInformation Technology (88.94%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateOct 21, 2024
Websitehttps://www.ishares.com/ch/professionals/en/products/339081/ishares-a-i-innovation-and-tech-active-etf

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$12.98B
Expense ratio0.65%
Holdings count56
NAV$42.04
Average volume3.74M
Distribution yield1.41%
Beta2.33

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Industrials1.09%
Information Technology88.94%
Communication5.65%
Consumer Discretionary3.10%
Cash and/or Derivatives0.64%
Materials0.77%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Taiwan (Province of China)20.11%
Netherlands0.94%
Korea (the Republic of)1.36%
Cayman Islands1.59%
Israel1.93%
Japan0.81%
Canada0.91%
United States72.35%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
39/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.59

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-30.85%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
31/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
29/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
21/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
44.55%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read BAI's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to BAI AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

BAI ETF Analytics FAQ

What is BAI's expense ratio?

BAI's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is BAI's dividend yield?

BAI's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is BAI?

BAI's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is BAI overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.