Current etf page

ETF Analytics

QQQI ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

NeutralEdge 3/10
$54.00−$0.16 (−0.30%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    28
  • Value
    32
  • Quality
    65
  • Risk resilience
    81
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

QQQI Holdings

105 holdings; the ten largest make up 46.49% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
105
Top 10 weight
46.49%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
NVDA
8.34%
Expense ratio
0.68%
$68.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$15.04B
Top sector
Technology
61.22%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NVDANVIDIA Corp8.34%$1.23B
2AAPLApple Inc7.62%$1.12B
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.81%$853.34M
4MUMicron Technology Inc4.78%$702.75M
5AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.36%$640.56M
6AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.67%$539.22M
7GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.11%$456.87M
8METAMeta Platforms Inc3.03%$445.35M
9GOOGAlphabet Inc2.89%$424.24M
10TSLATesla Inc2.89%$424.32M
11AVGOBroadcom Inc2.71%$398.5M
12INTCIntel Corp2.29%$335.95M
13WMTWalmart Inc2.27%$334.19M
14CSCOCisco Systems Inc1.95%$286.1M
15COSTCostco Wholesale Corp1.74%$255.23M
16PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.67%$245.58M
17LRCXLam Research Corp1.62%$238.01M
18AMATApplied Materials Inc1.60%$235.85M
19NFLXNetflix Inc1.42%$209.11M
20SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp1.26%$185.5M
21PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc1.20%$175.94M
22SNDKSandisk Corp1.08%$158.12M
23TXNTexas Instruments Inc1.06%$156.51M
24KLACKLA CORP1.04%$152.88M
25LINLinde PLC0.94%$137.76M

QQQI Expense Ratio

QQQI charges 0.68% a year, about $68.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$68.00
$25,000$170.00
$100,000$680.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$54.00
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$15.04B
Expense ratio
0.68%
Distribution yield
14.09%
Neos ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
105
NAV
$54.21
Average volume
5.09M
Inception
Jan 29, 2024
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Technology (61.22%)
Beta
0.93
Momentum score
28/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameNEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
IssuerNeos
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureTechnology (61.22%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJan 29, 2024
Websitehttps://neosfunds.com/QQQI

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$15.04B
Expense ratio0.68%
Holdings count105
NAV$54.21
Average volume5.09M
Distribution yield14.09%
Beta0.93

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Technology61.22%
Consumer Cyclical10.11%
Consumer Defensive5.63%
Communication Services12.72%
Healthcare3.87%
Financial Services0.20%
Energy0.45%
Basic Materials0.93%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Other2.22%
United Kingdom1.63%
Netherlands1.22%
United States92.58%
Singapore0.64%
Canada1.08%
Ireland0.23%
Uruguay0.40%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
48/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-0.26

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-13.73%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
28/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
32/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
81/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
17.12%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read QQQI's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to QQQI AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

QQQI ETF Analytics FAQ

What is QQQI's expense ratio?

QQQI's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is QQQI's dividend yield?

QQQI's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is QQQI?

QQQI's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is QQQI overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.