Current etf page

ETF Analytics

QQQM Holdings: Top Nasdaq-100 Stocks, Weights and Expense Ratio

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

In Line With Peers

NeutralEdge 4/10
$298.64+$3.05 (+1.03%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    35
  • Value
    35
  • Quality
    68
  • Risk resilience
    72
  • Sentiment
    50
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

QQQM answer

QQQM, the Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF, holds 109 positions tracking the Nasdaq-100: the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq. Its largest positions are NVDA (8.5%), AAPL (7.7%), MSFT (5.9%), MU (4.9%), AMZN (4.4%), and the top ten make up 47.0% of the fund. By sector it leans toward Technology (58.8%), Communication Services (12.1%), Consumer Cyclical (10.2%). QQQM's expense ratio is 0.15%: about $15.00 a year for every $10,000 invested.

Largest holdings
NVDA, AAPL, MSFT
Top 10 weight
47.0%
Holdings
109
Expense ratio
0.15%
Fund size
$80.59B
Top sectors
Technology (58.8%), Communication Services (12.1%), Consumer Cyclical (10.2%)
Data as of Oct 21, 2026 · Market close

QQQM Holdings

109 holdings; the ten largest make up 46.98% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
109
Top 10 weight
46.98%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
NVDA
8.49%
Expense ratio
0.15%
$15.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$80.59B
Top sector
Technology
58.84%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NVDANVIDIA Corp8.49%$8.83B
2AAPLApple Inc7.71%$8.02B
3MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.88%$6.11B
4MUMicron Technology Inc4.89%$5.09B
5AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.36%$4.53B
6AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.64%$3.79B
7GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.11%$3.24B
8METAMeta Platforms Inc3.07%$3.19B
9TSLATesla Inc2.92%$3.04B
10GOOGAlphabet Inc2.90%$3.01B
11AVGOBroadcom Inc2.75%$2.86B
12WMTWalmart Inc2.29%$2.38B
13INTCIntel Corp2.24%$2.33B
14CSCOCisco Systems Inc1.88%$1.95B
15COSTCostco Wholesale Corp1.78%$1.85B
16PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.69%$1.76B
17LRCXLam Research Corp1.65%$1.72B
18AMATApplied Materials Inc1.60%$1.66B
19NFLXNetflix Inc1.42%$1.48B
20SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp1.26%$1.31B
21PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc1.23%$1.27B
22SNDKSandisk Corp1.11%$1.16B
23TXNTexas Instruments Inc1.04%$1.09B
24KLACKLA Corp1.03%$1.07B
25LINLinde PLC0.95%$984.66M

QQQM Expense Ratio

QQQM charges 0.15% a year, about $15.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$15.00
$25,000$37.50
$100,000$150.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

How the fee compares
FundExpense ratioPer $10,000Comparison
QQQM0.15%$15.00
QQQ0.18%$18.00QQQM vs QQQ
VOO0.03%$3.00QQQM vs VOO
VTI0.03%$3.00QQQM vs VTI

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$298.64
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$80.59B
Expense ratio
0.15%
Distribution yield
0.44%
Invesco ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
109
NAV
$295.36
Average volume
3.09M
Inception
Oct 13, 2020
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Technology (58.84%)
Beta
1.23
Momentum score
35/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
IssuerInvesco
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureTechnology (58.84%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateOct 13, 2020
Websitehttps://www.invesco.com/content/invesco/us/en/financial-products/etfs/invesco-nasdaq-100-etf.html

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$80.59B
Expense ratio0.15%
Holdings count109
NAV$295.36
Average volume3.09M
Distribution yield0.44%
Beta1.23

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Cash & Others0.01%
Healthcare4.36%
Basic Materials0.97%
Consumer Cyclical10.16%
Energy0.46%
Consumer Defensive6.15%
Utilities1.09%
Industrials5.51%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Netherlands1.25%
United Kingdom1.65%
Canada1.07%
United States94.73%
Uruguay0.41%
Singapore0.63%
Ireland0.24%
Other0.02%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
50/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.77

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-12.19%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
35/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
35/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
72/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
19.76%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read QQQM's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to QQQM AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

QQQM Holdings FAQ

What are QQQM's top holdings?

QQQM's largest positions are NVDA (8.5%), AAPL (7.7%), MSFT (5.9%), MU (4.9%), AMZN (4.4%). The ten largest make up 47.0% of the fund.

How many stocks does QQQM hold?

QQQM holds 109 positions, the companies of the Nasdaq-100 index.

Does QQQM hold the same stocks as QQQ?

Yes. QQQM and QQQ track the same Nasdaq-100 index, so their holdings and weights match. They differ in cost and trading volume: QQQM's expense ratio is 0.15%.