Current etf page

ETF Analytics

XLF Holdings: Top Financial Stocks, Weights and Expense Ratio

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 30, 2026

XLFState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Leader

Sector Leader

BullishEdge 10/10
$56.51−$0.43 (−0.76%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    78
  • Value
    60
  • Quality
    76
  • Risk resilience
    75
  • Sentiment
    50
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 30, 2026

XLF answer

XLF, the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund, holds the 80 financial companies in the S&P 500: banks, insurers, payment networks and asset managers. Its largest positions are JPM (11.8%), BRK-B (11.6%), V (7.6%), MA (5.7%), BAC (5.1%), and the top ten make up 57.2% of the fund. XLF's expense ratio is 0.08%.

Largest holdings
JPM, BRK-B, V
Top 10 weight
57.2%
Holdings
80
Expense ratio
0.08%
Fund size
$52.19B
1Y price return
+7.2%
Data as of Oct 30, 2026 · Market close

XLF Holdings

80 holdings; the ten largest make up 57.23% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
80
Top 10 weight
57.23%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
JPM
11.81%
Expense ratio
0.08%
$8.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$52.19B
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1JPMJPMORGAN CHASE + CO11.81%$6.42B
2BRK-BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B11.58%$6.3B
3VVISA INC CLASS A SHARES7.59%$4.13B
4MAMASTERCARD INC A5.68%$3.09B
5BACBANK OF AMERICA CORP5.09%$2.77B
6GSGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC3.75%$2.04B
7WFCWELLS FARGO + CO3.41%$1.86B
8MSMORGAN STANLEY3.18%$1.73B
9CCITIGROUP INC2.94%$1.6B
10SCHWSCHWAB (CHARLES) CORP2.19%$1.19B
11AXPAMERICAN EXPRESS CO2.13%$1.16B
12BLKBLACKROCK INC1.91%$1.04B
13COFCAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP1.61%$873.78M
14PGRPROGRESSIVE CORP1.57%$856.47M
15SPGIS+P GLOBAL INC1.55%$843.66M
16CBCHUBB LTD1.52%$825.71M
17BNYBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP1.39%$756.6M
18CMECME GROUP INC1.24%$673.3M
19PNCPNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP1.22%$661.51M
20USBUS BANCORP1.21%$656.81M
21BXBLACKSTONE INC1.16%$631.63M
22HOODROBINHOOD MARKETS INC A1.12%$607.9M
23ICEINTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE IN1.10%$597.37M
24MRSHMARSH + MCLENNAN COS1.06%$579.1M
25TRVTRAVELERS COS INC/THE0.97%$529.9M

XLF Expense Ratio

XLF charges 0.08% a year, about $8.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$8.00
$25,000$20.00
$100,000$80.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$56.51
As of Oct 30, 2026
Fund size
$52.19B
Expense ratio
0.08%
Distribution yield
1.48%
SPDR ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
80
NAV
$56.93
Average volume
32.95M
Inception
Dec 16, 1998
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Financial Services (98.21%)
Beta
0.75
Momentum score
78/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
IssuerSPDR
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureFinancial Services (98.21%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateDec 16, 1998
Websitehttps://www.ssga.com/us/en/institutional/etfs/state-street-financial-select-sector-spdr-etf-xlf

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$52.19B
Expense ratio0.08%
Holdings count80
NAV$56.93
Average volume32.95M
Distribution yield1.48%
Beta0.75

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Cash & Others0.00%
Financial Services98.21%
Technology1.55%
Industrials0.24%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States98.41%
Switzerland1.59%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
72/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.42

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-15.23%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
78/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
60/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
75/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
14.40%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read XLF's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to XLF AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

XLF Holdings FAQ

What are XLF's top holdings?

XLF's largest positions are JPM (11.8%), BRK-B (11.6%), V (7.6%), MA (5.7%), BAC (5.1%); the ten largest make up 57.2% of the fund.

What is XLF's expense ratio?

XLF's expense ratio is 0.08% a year.